◒ Finance Circle
← Back to case library
Google / Alphabet source logo
COMPANY / SOURCE CONTEXTGoogle / Alphabet
Original Finance Circle caseTechnologyPublic-company contextSuggested 35 minutes

Cloud finance: buy growth or protect contribution?

A fictional cloud business is considering a discounted enterprise contract. The CFO wants to know whether the deal creates incremental contribution and whether the team has identified the right missing data.

Original Finance Circle cloud-business scenario. Every operating input is illustrative, not Alphabet results, prices, targets or an actual Google interview question.

Independent Finance Circle learning material. The source organisation does not sponsor, author or endorse this exercise.

THE INTERVIEW FLOW

Clarify. Structure. Calculate. Defend.

Take 2 minutes to clarify the decision and definitions, 3 minutes to structure the analysis, then work the exhibits. Finish with a concise recommendation and answer a follow-up. The time is a suggested practice format, not an employer requirement.

Clarify before solving

What are the data basis and reporting boundary?

Original Finance Circle cloud-business scenario. Every operating input is illustrative, not Alphabet results, prices, targets or an actual Google interview question.

Which assumptions can I use without requesting more data?

USD millions except unit prices. Existing annual cloud consumption is 10 million units at $2 each; variable servicing cost is $0.80 per unit. Fixed operating cost is 8. New contract adds 4 million units at $1.50 per unit. Variable cost stays $0.80 and incremental fixed support is 1.2. No cannibalisation in the base case.

What decision am I expected to support?

Under the director downside, calculate lost existing contribution and net incremental profit. Find the maximum cannibalised units that reduce incremental profit to zero.

Build your structure

  1. Existing versus incremental contract economics
  2. Service capacity and additional support cost
  3. Cannibalisation of full-price contribution
  4. Contract terms, collections and pricing governance

Use the branches that matter to this decision. A memorised framework is less useful than explaining why each analysis could change your recommendation.

01 · THE BRIEF & EXHIBITS

Everything you need to work the case.

Assumptions & boundaries

Illustrative consumption and cost model

MetricExisting businessNew contract
Units, million104
Price / unit$2.00$1.50
Variable cost / unit$0.80$0.80
Annual fixed cost, USD million81.2 incremental
02 · YOUR ANALYSIS

Choose the responsibility. Solve the decision.

Each level uses the exhibits above and asks a different question. Your entries stay in this open page only; copy your work before leaving.

Analyst

Build the base contribution model.

Calculate existing revenue, contribution before fixed costs and operating profit.

INTERVIEWER FOLLOW-UP

Which cost matters for the incremental deal?

Numerical checks compare your arithmetic with the case model. Written recommendations are self-practice and are not automatically graded.

03 · Reveal worked solution & decision guide

Expected numerical answers

Existing revenue
20 USD million
Existing contribution
12 USD million
Existing operating profit
4 USD million

Work through the calculation

  1. Revenue = 10 × 2 = 20. Variable cost = 10 × 0.80 = 8; contribution = 12.
  2. Operating profit = 12 − 8 = 4. Units are millions throughout.

A strong concise response

My calculation shows that existing revenue is 20 USD million; existing contribution is 12 USD million; existing operating profit is 4 USD million. Clarify consumption timing, net price, service cost and fixed versus incremental costs before using a generic growth framework.

Answer the interviewer follow-up

Which cost matters for the incremental deal?

Include the contract’s incremental variable servicing and support costs. Do not allocate existing fixed cost as if it automatically changes, but check whether capacity triggers additional fixed spending.

Assessment rubric · 20 points

For self-review or mentor discussion. This rubric is not an automated written-answer grade or an employer scoring system.

Calculation and reconciliation · 6 points

Correctly derives all 3 numerical results for this level, keeps signs and units consistent, and explains the method.

Structure and definitions · 5 points

Explains the objective: Build the base contribution model. States the supplied scope, timing and metric definitions before calculating.

Decision and challenge · 6 points

Clarify consumption timing, net price, service cost and fixed versus incremental costs before using a generic growth framework. Addresses the interviewer follow-up without contradicting the facts.

Communication and evidence · 3 points

Leads with a clear conclusion, distinguishes facts from assumptions, and identifies the next evidence needed. Does not claim the source company asked or endorsed this question.

Use full precision until the final rounding. Alternative written recommendations may be reasonable if they respect the facts and explain assumptions. This is Finance Circle’s guide, not an official source-company answer.

Source & attribution

The references below identify the public reporting, hiring guidance, research or mock-interview material used for context. Finance Circle wrote the exercise and its answers. Illustrative figures are explicitly identified; they are not company results or findings.

Alphabet Investor Relations ↗

Company business context only. The questions, figures and answers are authored by Finance Circle.

Google Careers: interview preparation ↗

Employer interview resource; the cloud exercise and answers are Finance Circle originals.

Source reviewed 30 October 2026. No external page is needed to answer this exercise. Company names and logos identify sources only. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.